Cochran v. Wyeth, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
¶ 1 In this failure to warn case, we are asked to decide whether a plaintiff can prove proximate causation where a drug manufacturer’s warning disclosed a risk of injury, the plaintiff sustained that very injury, but the manufacturer failed to disclose another risk of injury which the plaintiff did not sustain. We hold that in these circumstances, a plaintiff cannot prove proximate causation because the non-disclosed risk did not materialize in physical injury.
¶ 2 Nancy Cochran (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Wyeth,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Schaaf v. Residential Funding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Christian Lewis v. Sheila D. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Maya v. Johnson & JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Runner v. BardDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Rowland v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.