Legal Opinion
Glusband v. Fittin Cunningham Lauzon, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1984No. 80 Civ. 7387 (JES)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge:
Plaintiff, as receiver for Michael Star-buck, Inc. and Associates (“Associates”), commenced this action to recover assets of Associates which were lost, allegedly due to the fraudulent activities of the defendants. Amended Complaint para. 15.
Associates is a limited partnership. 1 The defendants are James Armenakis, as receiver for Michael Starbuck, Inc. (“MSI”), the general partner of Associates; Fittin Cunningham Lauzon Inc. (“Fittin, Inc.”), a broker and dealer in securities with whom Associates had a brokerage account; John Starbuck (“Starbuck”), an…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cilp Associates, L.P. v. Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Daniel J. Devaney, as Trustee Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code for Cb & R (Holdings) Ltd. v. A.P. ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Mann v. Kemper Financial Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Solutia Inc. v. FMC Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re Smith Barney Transfer Agent LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.