Chenoweth v. City of New Brighton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1ConcurrenceG. Barry Anderson, Judge
I concur in the result reached in this case, largely on the basis of Brennan v. *828Minneapolis Soc’y for the Blind, Inc., 282 N.W.2d 515, 524-25 (Minn.1979) and State v. Wicklund, 576 N.W.2d 758, 757 (Minn. App.1998), aff'd, 589 N.W.2d 793 (Minn. 1999). In particular, despite the mighty labor on the part of appellants’ counsel, I am not persuaded that the city here exercised the type, duration, and level of control over the development of the adjacent parcel so as to require the extraordinary remedy of inverse condemnation. Perhaps, as a matter of fundamental property rights, appellants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. WicklundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Coduti v. HauserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Brennan v. Minneapolis Society for the Blind, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.