Legal Opinion

Sinkler v. Siljan

California Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1902No. S.F. No. 2990PublishedCited by 15 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action on promissory note, executed in Alaska by defendant on July 3, 1900, payable to J. G. Bjornstad, or order, August 18, 1900, for three thousand dollars, alleged to have been transferred to plaintiff before maturity and without notice of any defenses thereto.

Defendant in his answer avers that prior to July 3, 1900, defendant and Bjornstad had been intimate friends, both in Alaska and at their former home in the town of Valhalla, North Dakota; that upon leaving Alaska to return to his home Bjornstad made certain false and fraudulent representations, by means of which defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collins v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Grannis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. California-Calaveras Mining Co. v. WallsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Goodale v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API