Legal Opinion
United States v. Alsbrook
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 23, 1971No. Crim. 1065-71PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND 1 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON ANCILLARY HEARING
GESELL, District Judge.
The Lorton Youth Center and the D. C. Board of Parole, while finding defendant Alsbrook amenable to rehabilitative treatment under the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 2 recommended that he be sentenced as an adult on the ground that “meaningful treatment cannot be provided due to overcrowding and inadequate facilities.” Because of this development and other recent indications that there has been a local breakdown in the administration of the Youth Corrections Act, this Court noticed an ancillary fact-finding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Smuck v. HobsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Lawrence J. Holt v. Robert Sarver, Commissioner of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Holt v. SarverDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
- Landman v. RoysterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Inmates of Boys' Training School v. AffleckDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
- Gerald B. Murphy, a Minor, by and Through His Parents and Next of Friends, Girlie A. Murphy and William C. Murphy v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Morales v. TurmanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
- JACKSON v. HendrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.