Legal Opinion

Hayus-Sammons Chemical Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 9, 1968No. 5257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlmond, Judge

Hayes-Sammons Chemical Co. appeals from the judgment of the Customs 'Court, First Division,1 overruling a protest against the collector’s classification of crude barytes ore in bulk.

The merchandise was classified as “barytes ore, crude or unmanu-factured” under paragraph 67 of the Tariff Act of 1980, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108. A shipmment entered in April 1958 (Protest 58/17794) was assessed with duty at the rate of $2.70 per long ton and a shipment made in 1960 (Protest 60/27892) was assessed at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherokee Brick & Tile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Doster v. Friedensville Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Grk Canada, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  5. Len-Ron Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API