Legal Opinion
Smith v. Phlegar
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1951No. 5342PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal by the defendant (appellant — Thad G. Smith) from a judgment of $14,600, entered against him on the plaintiff’s (appellee) complaint, denying his counterclaim, and foreclosing an attachment lien upon certain equipment and real estate belonging to the defendant.
On Sept. 17, 1948, the plaintiff, E. O. Phlegar, and defendant entered into a written contract, whereby the defendant agreed to build 29 homes, known as the Camelback Homes Subdivision, Phoenix, Arizona, and the plaintiff agreed to loan the defendant and his wife $15,000. The material parts of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connell v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re InnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- National Surety Co. v. WinslowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Ruby v. United Sugar Companies, S. A.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Crone v. AmadoArizona Supreme Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- E. J. Stern and Mabel Stern v. The Dunlap Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Cavness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Walgreen Arizona Drug Co. v. Plaza Center Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.