Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1900No. 19,171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— Appellant commenced this proceeding to sell the real estate of his intestate, described in the petition, *262to pay debts. Charles J. and Ada Fox were made defendants to said petition to answer as to their interest, if any, in said real estate. Ada Fox filed a cross-complaint, asking that she be reimbursed for valuable and lasting improvements made by her on said real estate, and for other relief. After issues were joined, the cause was tried by the court, and, over appellant’s motion for a new trial, said real estáte was ordered sold, and that, after applying a part of the proceeds of the sale…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fiscus v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hankins v. KimballIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kidwell v. KidwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Weakley v. ConradtIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Duncan v. GaineyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helvey v. O'NEILLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hutter v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. First National Bank v. ConnollyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Linville v. ChenowethIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API