Legal Opinion

Garza v. Garcia

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. 02-0300PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

in which Justice HECHT, Justice OWEN, Justice O’NEILL, Justice SCHNEIDER and Justice SMITH joined.

The Legislature amended the venue statutes in 1995 to allow a trial court to transfer venue “[f]or the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice.”1 At the same time, the Legislature mandated that a trial court’s order granting or denying such a transfer for convenience is “not grounds for appeal or mandamus and is not reversible error.” 2

In this case, a defendant filed a motion asserting both improper venue and inconvenience, which the trial court granted without…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. IKB Industries (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro-Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. K-Mart Corp. v. HoneycuttTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  5. The MD Anderson Cancer Center v. NovakTexas Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ex Parte Indiana Mills & Mfg., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Cunningham v. Zurich American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  4. Tukua Investments, LLC v. SpenstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Salinas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API