Legal Opinion

Clark v. Pigeon River Improvement Slide & Boom Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 27, 1931No. 9138PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant is a citizen of Canada. Appellee is a corporation exercising under the laws of Minnesota certain alleged rights on the Pigeon river, which is an international boundary line between the northeast corner of Minnesota and the province of Ontario.

Appellant is the owner of a large tract of timber on the Canadian side of the Pigeon river. Large amounts of timber are cut and piled on this land yearly, and the operation of producing pulpwood for the market has been carried on by him for many years. This pulpwood is floated down the Pigeon river to Pigeon Bay in Lake…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Buttfield v. StranahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Economy Light & Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Nielsen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Aerovias Interamericanas De Panama, S.A. v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1961
  3. Inghram v. Union Stock Yards Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1933
  4. Kingan & Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1935
  5. Bowater Steamship Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API