Legal Opinion

In re Proceedings in Disbarment against Burke

Cuyahoga Circuit Court

Decided January 15, 1899Published

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

In this matter two charges have been made against Vernon H. Burke. •

First, with having been guilty of misconduct in office as an attorney at law of the state of Ohio, and

Second, with having been guilty of unprofessional conduct involving moral turpitude.

Under these charges are three specifications.

The first is, that Vernon H. Burke and one Frank E. Dellenbaugh on the 1st day of January, 1895, and thence afterwards at all the dates and times mentioned, and thence continuously thereafter to the present time, were and still are, each of them, attorneys at law of the state of Ohio, licensed as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The People v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. People v. ChoynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. TonielliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Motsinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API