Legal Opinion

Chiquita Mining Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1940No. 3286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Annand, District Judge:

This case is before the court on appeal by defendant from an order of the trial court, dated March 13, 1939, granting plaintiff a new trial on the ground the verdict is against law. The cause was tried before a jury which returned a verdict for defendant in the sum of $8,500.

Fairbanks, Morse & Company, a corporation, commenced a claim and delivery action in the lower court against the Chiquita Mining Company, Ltd., a corporation, for the recovery of a certain Fairbanks Morse used engine and Diesel Electric Unit and accessories sold under the terms of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gage v. PhillipsNevada Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Farquhar Co. v. Hardy Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Carleton v. Lombard, Ayres & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lindsay v. FrickeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Murray Co. v. PutmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Havas v. AlgerNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Crockett & Myers, Ltd. v. NAPIER, FITZGERALLD & KIRBY, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  4. Widett v. Bond Estate, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Fairbanks v. Consolidated Fisheries Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API