Murray Co. v. Putman
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Navarro County; H. B. Daviss, Judge. Action by C. A. Putman against the Murray Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Findings of Fact.
JENKINS, J.
On July 15, 1907, .appellant, through its salesman, W. E. Ellison, sold to appellee, by written contract, two gin stands and some other gin machinery. Said contract, among other things, contained the following clause: “Warranty. — Said machinery is warranted to be good material, to perform well, if properly operated by competent persons. Upon starting, if the purchasers, at any time within ten days, are unable to make same operate well, telegraphic or written notice, stating wherein it fails to conform to the warranty, is at once to be given by the purchasers to…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Chiquita Mining Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1940
- Murray Gin Co. v. PutmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914