Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. v. Caldwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This bill alleged that Caldwell was indebted to the State by reason of having executed as surety bonds to secure payment of deposits made by the State in certain banks which had become insolvent and had failed to pay the deposits after demand; that Caldwell was insolvent, and was indebted to numerous‘other creditors who were threatening to sue him and attach or otherwise impound his property, which was described; that the State as the sovereign was entitled to priority in his assets and that unless restrained he would dispose thereof. The bill prayed for an injunction restraining other suits,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Peck v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McConnellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Cunningham v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  5. C. C. Houghton & Co. v. AxelssonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newman v. HaggardTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Shoen v. Sioux Falls Gas Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API