Shoen v. Sioux Falls Gas Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Defendants have appealed from orders over- • ruling their separate demurrers to the complaint.
The allegations of the voluminous complaint necessary to an understanding of the controversy may be summarized as follows: The defendant corporation is engaged in the business of selling gas for lighting and heating purposes in the city of Sioux Falls. Defendant Whiteman is its vice president and general manager, and is the only officer and managing agent within the state. Plaintiffs are creditors of defendant corporation, and bring this action in behalf of themselves and all other creditors who have…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- Gordon v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Baird v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.