Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Gage Bowl, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1992No. B055904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

In an action for damages for personal injuries based on premises liability, plaintiff appeals from judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendant Gage Bowl, Inc., entered after the conclusion of plaintiff’s opening statement. (Code Civ. Proc., § 581c.)

Facts

The complaint alleged: In a parking lot owned and operated by defendant Gage Bowl, Inc., plaintiff sustained personal injuries when she was struck by a sign which fell from a building adjacent to the parking lot owned by defendants General Veneer and Geneerco, Inc., and occupied by defendant Howard Manufacturing, Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Schwartz v. Helms Bakery LimitedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Contreras v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Annocki v. Peterson EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Swann v. OlivierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Alcaraz v. VeceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API