Legal Opinion

State v. Hohman

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 1, 1978No. 350-76PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaley, J.

The defendant was charged with murder in the first degree for the killing of a young girl in the Town of Shaftsbury. As a defense to the charge he claimed to have been legally insane at the time of the offense. In a trial by jury, from which he was absent at his personal request, he was found guilty of murder in the second degree. On appeal the defendant alleges several claims of prejudicial error. We hold that two of the errors raised by the defendant so impinged upon his fundamental right to a fair trial that we are compelled to overturn the conviction and order a new trial.

The first claim…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  3. State v. KasperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. State v. ValleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API