Legal Opinion
Hough v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 3, 2005No. S05G0311, S05G0640PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Melton, Justice.
Because both of these appeals regard the constitutionality and construction of Georgia’s Implied Consent Statute, OCGA § 40-5-55, they have been consolidated for our review. In Case No. S05G0311, Scott Hough contends that the Court of Appeals erred in its determination that the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress the results of a test of his blood following a traffic accident. See Hough v. State, 269 Ga. App. 744 (605 SE2d 43) (2004). In Case No. S05G0640, the State argues that the Court of Appeals erred by reversing the trial court and finding that Bryan Reid…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Perano v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
- Minor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- State v. TurnquestSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Harris v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.