Legal Opinion

State v. Jack Hughes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 2013No. A13A1399Published

1Opinion of the Court

WHOLE COURT NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ November 21, 2013 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A1399. THE STATE v. HUGHES. RAY, Judge. The State appeals from the trial court’s grant of Jack Hughes’ motion to suppress the results of a blood test, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that the arresting officers lacked probable cause to request the blood test under the implied consent statute. For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API