Legal Opinion

State v. Mohamed

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 2015No. 72328-6-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 Ali Abukar Mohamed appeals his judgment and sentence for his four convictions of delivery of cocaine that included school zone enhancements for three of these convictions. He argues that the trial court improperly limited impeachment of a police informant who testified at trial. He claims that the lead detective, who also testified at *634trial, “improperly vouched” for the informant. Additionally, Mohamed seeks a remand for a new sentencing hearing based on his claim that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion based on a mistaken belief about sentencing enhancements. And he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. YanceyWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State of Washington v. James Austin YanceyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. State Of Washington v. Matthew Forrest BrasfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington, . v. Francisco Cuahutemoc VazquezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington, V. Charles Gene Tatum, IiiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API