Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V. Charles Gene Tatum, Iii

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 3, 2021No. 80795-1Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 80795-1-I Respondent, (consolidated with 80796-0-I, 80797-8-I, 80798-6-I, and 80799-4-I) v. DIVISION ONE CHARLES GENE TATUM, III, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant. SMITH, J. — Charles Tatum III appeals the imposition of Department of Corrections (DOC) supervision fees and interest on his nonrestitution legal financial obligations (LFOs) in several consolidated cases. After our Supreme Court decided State v. Blake, __ Wn.2d ___,

481 P.3d 521

(2021), Tatum supplemented his appeal to challenge his conviction for drug…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State Of Washington v. George Abraham DillonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API