Legal Opinion
Arce v. Aramark Corp.
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided January 10, 2003No. CIV.99-1955 RLAPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Ventura Tirado Arce (“Tira-do”) and his common law wife, Norma I. Diaz Alejandro, bring the present action against ARAMARK Services of Puerto Rico, Inc. (“ARAMARK”) and ARAMARK Corporation (“ARAMARK Corporation”). Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VU”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., Puerto Rico Law 100 of May 30, 1959, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 29, § 146…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Salgado-Candelario v. Ericsson Caribbean, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Torres-Alman v. Verizon Wireless Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Vazquez v. MUNICIPALITY OF JUNCOSDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
- Zayas v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005
- Pérez-Maspons v. Stewart Title Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.