Legal Opinion
American Empire Insurance v. Hanover National Bank
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 9, 1976No. Civ. No. 75-181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
The protagonists in this case are the C. G. Grant Construction Corporation *461(Grant), the Hanover National Bank of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania (Bank), its President, Russell Gardner, the American Empire Insurance Company and its agent, Morton F. Hulse.
On October 15, 1973, Grant was substantially indebted to the Bank in connection with the financing of various construction projects. On or about October 17, 1973, Grant’s President and Morton F. Hulse, acting at that particular time as an agent of the Wisconsin Surety Company, met with Gardner. Grant had been awarded a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. PottorffSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- McWilliams v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- William B. Tanner Co., Inc., and Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. Wioo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Sokoloff v. StrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Am. Empire Ins. Co. v. HANOVER NAT. BANK ETC.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Corporacion De Mercadeo Agricola v. Mellon Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Corporacion De Mercadeo Agricola v. Mellon Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979