Rosillo v. State

OPINION

FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA, Jr., Justice.

A jury found appellant, Raul Guerrero Ro-sillo, guilty of murder and assessed his punishment at thirty years’ confinement and a $10,000.00 fine. By fourteen points of error, appellant contends that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient, that the jury charge was erroneous, that the trial court commented on the weight of the evidence, that the State’s final argument was harmful, and that proceeding with the punishment phase when appellant was not present was an abuse of discretion. We affirm.

By his first point of error, appellant complains…