Legal Opinion
Copeland Oaks v. Haupt
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 25, 1999No. 4:98-cv-00780PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GWIN, District Judge.
On April 27, 1998, Defendants Jeffrey Haupt and Brooke Haupt (collectively, “Haupt”) filed a motion for summary judgment in this lawsuit to enforce the terms of an employee benefit plan arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 as amended (“ERISA”) [Doc. 5], On July 17, 1998, the Haupts filed a motion for judgment on their counterclaim [Doc. 18]. On July 22, 1998, Plaintiffs Copeland Oaks and Copeland Oaks Employee Benefit Plan (collectively, “Copeland Oaks”) also filed a motion for summary judgment [Doc. 19].
In this decision, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Copeland Oaks and Copeland Oaks Employee Benefit Plan v. Jeffrey A. Haupt and Brooke A. HauptCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Serbin v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Oaks v. HauptCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000