Legal Opinion
Fitzhenry-Russell v. Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 2, 2018No. Case No.17-cv-00564-NCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge
In this class action, plaintiffs Jackie Fitzhenry-Russell and Gegham Margaryan allege *1114defendants Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. and Canada Dry Mott's Inc.1 defrauded California consumers by marketing their Canada Dry Ginger Ale ("Canada Dry") as "Made from Real Ginger." According to Plaintiffs, Dr. Pepper defrauds consumers because Canada Dry is made with a ginger derivative, ginger oleoresin, not ginger root. Plaintiffs also allege that Canada Dry contains less ginger than consumers are led to expect. Finally, Plaintiffs allege that Canada Dry's…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe v. ESA P Portfolio LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Fitzgerald v. Polar Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020