Legal Opinion

Gregory v. Haworth

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and defendant appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sanderson, C. J.

This action was brought to compel the defendant to transfer to the plaintiff twelve shares of the capital stock of the California Stage Company, alleged to have formerly belonged to one Bartol and assigned by him to Riddle and Eaton, and by them to the plaintiff, or in case the said Haworth had in any manner disposed of said stock, or any portion thereof, to compel him to account with and pay to the plaintiff the value thereof. The complaint is most singularly drawn, and seems to proceed upon inconsistent theories, and it is not easy to determine upon which…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Davis v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Greer v. HeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Keeling v. HoytNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Bender v. BenderOregon Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API