Legal Opinion
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Hawthorne
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 1, 2001No. CV-01-01862 CBMPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Granting Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice
MARSHALL, District Judge.
The matters before the Court, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge presiding, are (1) Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice and (2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The parties appeared before the Court on May 21, 2001. Upon consideration of the arguments presented, the Court grants Plaintiffs Request for Judicial Notice and denies Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
JURISDICTION
This action is before the court pursuant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Walnut CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Sprint Telephony Pcs, L.P. v. County Of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.