Legal Opinion
Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 15, 2001No. C01-0663SIPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
ILLSTON, District Judge.
On November 9, 2001, the Court heard argument on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs second claim for relief. Having carefully considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS defendants’ motion to dismiss for the reasons set forth below.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Qwest Communications Corporation (“Qwest”) is a telephone company defined as a public utility under California Public Utilities Code § 216. First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶ 4. The California…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Seidner v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Qwest Corp. v. City of Santa Fe, New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
- Sprint Telephony PCS, L.P. v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Walnut CreekDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- TracFone Wireless v. NEB. PUB. SERV. COM'NNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.