Rothschild v. Mooney
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Ludwig Rothschild and others against Henrietta R. Mooney. A warrant of attachment was granted in this action, and defendant appeals from an order denying her motion to vacate the same, made on the attachment papers. The following opinion was rendered on the denial of the motion by O’Brien, J.: “Upon this motion to vacate the warrant of attachment, two grounds are relied upon—First.
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Ludwig Rothschild and others against Henrietta R. Mooney. A warrant of attachment was granted in this action, and defendant appeals from an order denying her motion to vacate the same, made on the attachment papers. The following opinion was rendered on the denial of the motion by O’Brien, J.: “Upon this motion to vacate the warrant of attachment, two grounds are relied upon—First. The alleged irregularity of the warrant of attachment. The warrant recites as a ground for attachment that the defendant has disposed, or is about to dispose, of…
1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.
An examination of this record leads, without hesitation, to the conclusion that the learned justice in the court below correctly disposed of the motion, and therefore the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon his opinion. All concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Cronin v. CrooksNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith, Perkins & Co. v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1894