Legal Opinion

Stockmens State Bank v. Pollat

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1936No. 29490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action on a promissory note for $1,900, dated April 16, 1932, and payable 60 days thence. The Stockmens State Bank, payee, commenced the suit, but S. D. Ralston, present owner of the note, was substituted plaintiff pending litigation. The note was executed and delivered by Lewis Poilat and Anna S. Drake, defendants, and contains this provision:

“Each hereby pledges his or her separate property and estate for the payment of this note.”

In a separate answer defendant Anna S. Drake pleaded in substance that the note was a renewal of a 2,500-dollar note reduced by payments to $1,900;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers National Bank v. OhmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. First National Bank v. GolderNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Luikart v. MeierjurgenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Bennington State Bank v. PetersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buffalo County v. RichardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Drake v. MorrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Drake v. RalstonNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API