Legal Opinion

Bennington State Bank v. Petersen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1926No. 23747PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action by the payee against the makers of three promissory notes to recover the amount due thereon. Judgment by default was entered against defendant Petersen. The other defendant, Markmann, filed an answer in which he admitted the signing and delivery of the notes, but alleged as a defense that he signed them as an accommodation to the plaintiff and without consideration, and upon the understanding and agreement that his name was appended to the notes so that plaintiff could exhibit the notes with his signature to the state bank examiner, and that' Markmann was not to be called…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luikart v. MeierjurgenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. J. I. Case Co. v. HrubeskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Robinson v. LinnOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Stockmens State Bank v. PollatNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ricketts v. ReichenbachNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API