Bowe v. Scott
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of this court under § 237, Judicial Code, and what constitutes raising the Federal question in the state court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White
To .an understanding of this case we outline the situation of the property in controversy:
Shafer owned a tract of land which came to be within the limits of the City of Richmond, .bounded on the north by Franklin Street, on the south by Park Avenue, on the east by Shafer and on the west by Harrison Streets. He dedicated to public use by deed in due form which was accepted by the city, a public alley .20 feet wide, crossing from Shafer to Harrison Street at a distance of about 150 feet' south of Franklin Street, the alley being therefore ■ between Franklin and Park Avenue. ..All the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miller v. Cornwall RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Harding v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Adams v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. McLaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- State v. LOUIS UNION TRUST CO.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.