Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. State ex rel. Ward

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1893No. 1,112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee brought suit to 'foreclose a drainage lien against appellant’s railroad, alleging appellant’s continued ownership of the road, and refusal to pay the lien. Appellant answered by a general denial. There was a trial and finding in favor of appellee, and judgment for a foreclosure of the lien. There was no order for the sale of appellant’s road, but a personal judgment was rendered against the appellant for the amount of [the assessment, the attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.

Appellant objected and excepted to the personal judgment rendered against it, and its motion to modify the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pape v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. DeVay v. DunlapIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FishIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Indianapolis & Vincennes Railway Co. v. Capitol Paving & Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. BowkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Georgia Power Co. v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API