Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
A petitioner seeking appellate review, under General Statutes § 52-470 (b), of a ruling on his or her petition for a writ of habeas corpus ordinarily must obtain certification from the habeas court that he or she is entitled to such review.1 Upon certification, the petitioner has only twenty days to file an appeal. See Practice Book § 80-1, formerly § 4166C. In the present case, through no fault of the indigent petitioner, the appeal was delayed for almost six months. The issue before us is whether, under the uncontested circumstances of the administrative confusion that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gaines v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Iovieno v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kim v. MagnottaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Monk v. Temple George Associates, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Lighthouse Landings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Alliance Partners, Inc. v. Voltarc Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.