Legal Opinion
Eastland Construction Co., Inc. v. Keasbey and Mattison Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1966No. 20094_1PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
On June 1,1962, an indictment was returned in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania charging the Keasbey and Mat-tison Company and the Johns-Manville Corporation with restraining and monopolizing commerce in asbestos-cement pipe in violation of the Sherman Act. 1 On the same day, Keasbey sold its asbestos-cement pipe business, including a plant located within the Northern District of California, and has done no business in California since.
On November 18, 1964, Eastland Construction Company, Inc., filed a treble damage action 2 against Keasbey and Johns-Manville based…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Scophony Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Pacific Car and Foundry Company v. Honorable Martin Pence, United States District Judge, District of Hawaii, and L. C. O'Neil Trucks Pty. LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Lamont v. HaigCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Lee v. PlyGem Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.