Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Armco, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 8, 1986No. Civ. Y-85-1396PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
The Maryland Casualty Company seeks a declaratory judgment that it does not have a duty to defend a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) suit brought against its insured, Armco, Inc., and a host of other defendants in the Western District of Missouri. United States v. Conservation Chemical Co., No. 82-0983-CV-W-5. Maryland Casualty issued general business insurance policies to Armco from 1966 to 1983. The parties do not dispute the terms of those insurance policies or the underlying facts in the Conservation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- United States Aviex Co. v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- United States v. MottoloDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1985
- Government Employees Insurance v. DeJamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Specialty Coatings Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- New Castle County v. Hartford Accident And Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.