Legal Opinion

State v. Gerald

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1992No. C2-91-1789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Following a jury trial, appellant Quintín Gerald was convicted of first degree assault and aggravated robbery. On appeal, he claims there was insufficient evidence to establish the victim suffered great bodily harm. He also argues the prosecutor committed misconduct which denied him a fair trial and the trial court erred in imposing separate sentences for the assault and robbery convictions.

FACTS

Around 2:30 a.m. on December 23, 1990, cab driver Daniel Melford drove to North Minneapolis to pick up a passenger. While waiting for his passenger, Melford saw appellant and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. BoitnottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HalvorsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun DyeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Bradford Cain Dopkins v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API