State of Minnesota v. Quintin Deshun Dye

OPINION

KIRK, Judge.

Appellant Quintín De'shun Dye challenges his convictions of first-degree assault, second-degree assault, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing (1) the evidence, was insufficient to support his conviction of first-degree- assault because the victim did not suffer great bodily harm; (2) appellant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause were violated when the district court allowed the jury to hear the victim’s statements to the 911 dispatcher and to police officers at the scene; (3) the district court erred in admitting certain statements of the victim as prior…