Legal Opinion

Wingard v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 29, 1981No. Civ. 20512PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

Plaintiff Mollie Wingard appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained the motion of defendant, Safeway Stores, Inc., for summary judgment. At issue is whether Safeway, which contracted with a security service for a security guard to protect its warehouse against theft, owed a duty to protect the guard against rape by an intruder. We affirm the judgment.

Facts

Plaintiff, an employee of American Patrol Service, a security guard service, was assigned by her employer to patrol a warehouse owned by Safeway. The specific nature of plaintiff1 s duties…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gomez v. TicorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Cohen v. Southland Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API