Wingard v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
Plaintiff Mollie Wingard appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained the motion of defendant, Safeway Stores, Inc., for summary judgment. At issue is whether Safeway, which contracted with a security service for a security guard to protect its warehouse against theft, owed a duty to protect the guard against rape by an intruder. We affirm the judgment.
Facts
Plaintiff, an employee of American Patrol Service, a security guard service, was assigned by her employer to patrol a warehouse owned by Safeway. The specific nature of plaintiff1 s duties…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Cornpropst v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Sharon P. v. Arman, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Gomez v. TicorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cohen v. Southland Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.