Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Stamper v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1991No. 90-2551PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Appellant argued below that he was denied due process at his parole revocation hearing because he was not permitted to be represented by counsel, to present witnesses or documents, or to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses as required by Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484. The court of appeals held that appellees’ evidence submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment indicated that appellant had been granted the right to present witnesses and documents and to confront and cross-examine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Witzke v. WithrowDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  4. John Brenton Preston v. Arthur PiggmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Marsh v. Tibbals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State ex rel. Adkins v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Adkins v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State ex rel. Jackson v. McFaulOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API