Hartz v. Detroit, Plymouth & Northville Railway
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Ejectment by John C. Hartz against the Detroit, Plymouth & Northville Railway. There was judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, C. J.
This is an action of ejectment. After suit was commenced, the defendant filed a bill of complaint to enjoin the further prosecution of the suit, which was decided both in the circuit court in chancery and in this court against the contention of the defendant. De*338troit, etc., R. Co. v. Hartz, 147 Mich. 354. The suit at law was afterwards tried, in which the plaintiff recovered a judgment.
Two questions are raised :
1. Did the court err in permitting an amendment to the declaration ? The original declaration contained the description of the entire piece of land owned by the plaintiff, only a small…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Paine v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Wheeler v. . SpinolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Butler v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Mill River Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bauman v. BarendregtMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Moore v. ProvostMichigan Supreme Court · 1919