Legal Opinion
Clendaniel v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 18, 1984Published
1Opinion of the Court
96 N.J. 361 (1984)
476 A.2d 263
KURT CLENDANIEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 6, 1984.
Decided June 18, 1984.
John Aleli argued the cause for appellant (Steedle, Megargee, Youngblood, Franklin & Corcoran, attorneys).
Gerald J. Neski argued the cause for respondent (Adler, Neski & Garofola, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by GARIBALDI, J.
This appeal concerns the interpretation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-10 (Section 10) of the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act (prior to its…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Schreiber; Concurrence · Schreiber.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Abbotts Dairies, Inc. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Hoffman v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Matsuo Yoshida and Chisato Yoshida v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Ortiz v. Safeco Insurance CompanyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Clendaniel v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.