Legal Opinion · Dissent

Communication Technical Systems, Inc. v. Densmore

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1998No. 20234, 20258Published

1DissentSabers, Justice

[¶ 44.] I dissent. , The contract between Gateway and CTS is not an agreement in restraint of trade; on the contrary, it is an agreement in furtherance of trade — because without it, CTS was apparently unwilling to continue providing its services to Gateway.

[¶ 45.] “[T]he mere fact that some restraint results does not render a contract void[.]” Lien v. Northwestern Eng’g Co., 73 S.D. 84, 92, 39 N.W.2d 483, 488 (1949). “Every agreement concerning trade, every regulation of trade, restrains. To bind, to restrain, is of their very essence.” Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States, 246…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Scott v. Snelling and Snelling, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  4. Milton v. Hudson Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Matter of Estate of GossmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API