Legal Opinion

Carstens v. House

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1917No. 13677PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior, court for King county, Albertson, J., entered November 22, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiffs, Thomas Carstens and Herman Meyer, copartners doing business under the firm name of Pacific Oil Mills, and successors in interest, by assignment, of Pacific Oil Mills, a corporation, commenced this action in the superior court for King county seeking recovery of $4,015, claimed as the purchase price of peanuts sold by that corporation to the defendant, The Nut House, a corporation, during the months of November and December, 1913, and the month of January, 1914. It is conceded by defendant that peanuts of that total value were so sold to it and that the claim therefor was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Cabinet Co. v. HerrmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Pacific Power, & Light Co. v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Bullock v. FinleyUnited States Circuit Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henry Broderick, Inc. v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nut House v. Pacific Oil MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Utterback v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API