Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Sechrist

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1940No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, J.,

Opinion by

We are all of the opinion that the learned court below erred in opening a judgment entered against the defendant for want of an affidavit of defense. There was a petition to open on which a rule to show cause was granted and a responsive answer by plaintiff. These pleadings raised disputed questions of fact and no depositions were taken by either party.

While courts have broad powers with respect to the opening of judgments, this discretion must be grounded upon competent evidence: Woods v. Irwin, 141 Pa. 278, 21 A. 603; Emademe v. Weadick, 69 Pa. Superior Ct. 369, 372;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woods v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  2. Emademe v. WeadickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Feldman v. LeaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. BorishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Oppenheimer v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Roca Bacó v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Lloyd v. JacobySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Roca Bacó v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API