Beaufort County v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett
Beaufort County appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the State, finding S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 (Supp.2000) does not violate S.C. Const, art. X. We affirm.
FACTS
Beaufort County asserts S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 violates S.C. Const, art. X. The State contends the statute is constitutional. The Circuit Court granted Richard Holtcamp (“Holtcamp”) intervenor status and granted the State’s motion for summary judgment.1
As no facts are in dispute, no party argues summary judgment was improper as a matter of law. The sole issue is whether § 27-32-240 violates S.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Meredith v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
- Newberry Mills, Inc. v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
- Davis v. County of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richland County Assessor v. HullSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014