Legal Opinion

Beaufort County v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 3, 2003No. 25601PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

Beaufort County appeals the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the State, finding S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 (Supp.2000) does not violate S.C. Const, art. X. We affirm.

FACTS

Beaufort County asserts S.C.Code Ann. § 27-32-240 violates S.C. Const, art. X. The State contends the statute is constitutional. The Circuit Court granted Richard Holtcamp (“Holtcamp”) intervenor status and granted the State’s motion for summary judgment.1

As no facts are in dispute, no party argues summary judgment was improper as a matter of law. The sole issue is whether § 27-32-240 violates S.C.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Joytime Distributors & Amusement Co. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Meredith v. ElliottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  4. Newberry Mills, Inc. v. DawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Davis v. County of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richland County Assessor v. HullSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API