Richland County Assessor v. Hull
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The appellant challenges an administrative law court’s (ALC) order finding the respondent correctly valued the appellant’s land for property tax purposes. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities:
1. Determination of property values: S.C.Code Ann. § 1-23-610(B) (Supp.2013) (“The Court may not substitute its judgment for the judgment of the [ALC] as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact.”); S.C.Code Ann. § 12-37-930 (2014) (“All property must be valued for taxation at its true value in money which in all cases is the price which the property would…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Centex International, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Reliance Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Cloyd v. MabryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Smith v. Newberry County AssessorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.