Legal Opinion
Employers Insurance v. Jostens, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1998No. CIV. No. 98-1338(DSD/JMM)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on objections by defendant Jostens, Inc. (“Jostens”) to the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason dated August 3, 1998. In his report, the magistrate judge recommends that the court deny Jostens’ motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Employers Insurance of Wausau (“Wausau”) for failure to join an indispensable party. Jostens objects to several aspects of the report and recommendation, including the application of existing case law to the joinder issues raised in this case. Having conducted a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Taco Bell Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2001