Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Taco Bell Corp.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 9, 2001No. 1:99-cv-00797Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Cross-Defendant Zurich Insurance Company’s (“Zurich”) Motion to Dismiss the Cross-Complaint. Zurich seeks to dismiss Taco Bell Corporation’s (“Taco Bell”) Cross-Complaint seeking a declaration of Zurich’s alleged duty to defend and/or indemnify Taco Bell in an underlying lawsuit. Zurich seeks dismissal claiming that the Cross-Complaint raises the same issues and seeks the same relief as that sought in a pending action in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, filed on November 19, 1998. For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. Dawn MercierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API